Peer Editing: Sandel and Walzer

1.     The response should provide a coherent discussion of the topic, purpose, and content of the piece.
a.      In what ways is this effectively done? Provide specific examples and explain
b.     In what ways should this be improved? Provide examples and provide specific suggestions
2.     The characterization of the question at issue and author’s purpose needs to be clear, accurate, and well-developed
a.      What accurate, reasonable ideas are presented ? Provide specific examples and explain
b.     Identify something that may be inaccurate, vague, or limited and provide a specific suggestion. If not – how could these ideas supplement or support yours?
3.     The description of the supporting strategies used by the author needs to be specific, supported with evidence, and clearly tied to the subject or purpose of the piece.
a.      Find an example of one of these things being done well.  Explain why it is effective
b.     Find a place where this could be developed, clarified, or improved. Provide a specific suggestion